Reviewer's Rating:

Starring: Eva Flowers, Krysti Lynn, Felecia, Jen Teal, Kirsty Waay, Annabelle D'Ayne, Joey Silvera, Jon Dough, Tom Byron, Ron Jeremy, Julian St. Jox, Mr. Marcus, Damien Michaels, Steve Austin, Jamie Gillis
There's so many people here, and most of them do a fine job, so perhaps the best way to comment on this is by telling you who did the worst. And the honors go to. . .
RON JEREMY: For looking like a fat hairball. But that's not all! here you'll see him dressed in a butcher's apron. Just imagine who DISGUSTING this sight is! It would be like a pig taking over the place of the butcher!
JAMIE GILLIS: The one --and only-- reason I could ever found to see this old fart in a 90's video is because his a pal of John Leslie (who directed the flick). This guy was terrible in the old days of porn and watching him giving a hard time to the people in the flick for flubbing lines is simply revolting. Do yourselves a favor and fast forward this.
The girls are all great looking, let me not forget. They all are natural looking (that is, no implants), and should really provide a nice respite from Jenna Jameson's disgusting fake boobs.

They are, well. . . weird. . . This flick comes as close to surrealism as you can get. Lets take, for example, the title itself: "Fresh Meat. " It has very little to do with the plot aside from the fact that Ron Jeremy plays something that seems like a butcher.
Speaking about the plot: it's also somewhat surreal. In one scene two soldiers are going to give Tom Byron beating but then some chick beats the soldiers and makes them watch her having sex with byron. Then Ron comes up (in the butcher thing) and tells them to kill themselves (the two soldiers, that is). Then the rest of the video deals with some house that's supposed to be hounted. Like I said; weird.
On a more technical side, it appears that John Leslie thinks that playing around with the image and sound is something porn fans look for. WRONG! Every single fucking time there's a switch of image texture, color, or motion speed, or sound distortion what's REALLY the first thing that comes to mind? "HEY! SOMEBODY FUCKING FIX THE DAMN TV!" Seriously: there's no point in trying to be "artsy" porn viewers want to see SEX not special effects.

It's certainly good if you can spare the weirdness in between. There's facial action, your regular sex position, etc. Best of all, the girls are so good looking that the sex really spices up. Granted, Leslie did a lousy job with the "artsy" thing but he did a good job telling people how to fuck.

The selection of the girls. They are all natural (no implants) and they all perform like real troopers. And, you know? that's the good thing about videos with unknowns. Normally they are far better performers than some of the old, overexposed startlets who pollute the industry.

The surrealistic "artsyness" of the video. It just doesn't make sense. From a strictly porn stand point it is simply IRRELEVANT. Who the FUCK cares about what goes on in a porn flick aside from the sex? If I wanted to see surreal I'd see a mainstream flick. But no, porn fans want to see sex, not art, so there. Also: May this be the LAST time Jaime Gillis appears in front of the camera. It is bad enough with Ron Jeremy still causing convulsions.

Strictly on the sex this flick deserves a 7. It's good, definitely good. Could have been an 8, but the direction was too pretentious and that brings it down.

Posted By Reviewer, www.excaliburfilms.com | 10/12/06 1:58 PM