Lobo's Rating:

Starring: Gloria Roberts, John Leslie, Susannah French, Kristine Heller, Nancy Hoffman.
For porn star's this is high art: This is one of the early movies where porn stars were reaching beyond themselves and we loved for it.

For early porn this was great it was set in the "now" you had office politics plus a realistic homelife conflict, and a subplot with that young lady that was "way to cool".

Let me tell you about the movie eroticesm: Julie made you care about her. (unlike most of today's orn stars with the exception of a few, they are all beautiful, they all have bodies to die for, they all take it up the butt, mouth, cunt, ear? etc. etc. they all leave you cold. ) and as far as mr. Leslie concerned he was the "bad guy" you boo'ed and hiss'ed when he came on the screen.

What Julie did to the chicken was insane!!!

This is porn: what do you want?

My opinion is that they were trying , they made "go" of it. and you can see the effort of screen. They set the "bar" high. (which I don't think todays "pornstar's can match). This was a fun movie. I give is a 5 for effort.

Posted By Lobo, www.excaliburfilms.com | 10/12/06 1:58 PM

Reviewer's Rating:

Starring: Susannah French, Kristine Heller, Nancy Hoffman, Gloria Roberts, John Leslie.
Despite the fact that this is a "golden era" flick the performances, from a strictly porn standpoint are wimpy. The worst of all is John Leslie. This guy not only is irritating, but, throughout his years in porn, has never been able to really deserve being congratulated. Hell! many times I have figured I can do better than him!
Still, for those who are into "the good old days" porn the acting may entice you. Because, indeed, most of the cast can in fact *gasp!* ACT!
What did you think of the film's production values?
The production honors the fame the 70's have as the golden era of porn. There is much dialog, it's shot on film, the locations vary (not just one house over the weekend), and you can tell that in fact this is a movie in which graphic sex is shown.
From a technical stand point, nevertheless, given the fact that it is a 70's flick it may lack the luster of some of today's features when it comes to image and sound.
The plot revolves around John Leslie having an escort service for women. As you may imagine, him and his pals get to screw all the gals.

It's wimpy. The sex scenes are all too short. I mean, it's not like looping is desired, but it makes you wonder if you are watching the flick for the sex or the plot (and who the fuck watches porn for a plot?)
You'll get some standard sex, but nothing wild. If you're into porn for the sex you may want to skip this one.

Actually the fact that none of the current video chicannery is to be found here; no looping, no 5 scene and the video is over crap, no bad acting, and no fake tits. Even though the flick is wimpy sexwise it sure is a nice respite from today's crap.

Every single time John Leslie was on screen. Along with Randy West this is one of those asswipes who you'd rather not see ever again.
Also, again, the sex being so wimpy. Hey! Porn is done for the sex, dammit!

Based exclusively on the sex it deserves a It may be a golden era flick, but hell! Porn is for sex. If I wanted to see a good movie I would rent a mainstream video.

Posted By Reviewer, www.excaliburfilms.com | 10/12/06 1:58 PM