Description: "The breathtaking beauty of the Swiss Alps provides the backdrop for smoldering sensuality in Hot Bodies. Roland, a handsome forty-year old businessman, is quite fond of his lovely wife, Doris - but that doesn't stop him from taking advantage of the lovely young girls who are always attracted to him. Not that Doris isn't open minded, however - after seeing an erotic movie with her husband, the couple ends up going with a lovely young woman and engaging in a torrid threeway affair. But this erotic interlude leaves Doris with a bad taste, and she gives Roland the perfect opportunity to bring home all the girls he's ever wanted; and Doris gets a chance to live it up with Didier and his best friend. But too much of a good thing is the downfall of this liberated couple. They will catch themselves indulging their hot bodies in some very hot sex!"
Starring: Olinka Gabrille Pontello Kathy Menard Aurore This movie is about a businessman and his wife Doris. Doris is not very hot in bed, as a result hubby is always out looking for new stuff. He picks up Olinka on a boat screws her while the passengers look on. Hubby encourages Doris to take a trip with her boss. Whe she has left he picks up two hitchhikers and invite them to his apartment. They want to move in and the only way he can get rib of them is by hiring a guy to wreck the place. Doris returns home after spending a weekend in bed with other guys and forgives him for the mess. She is a new woman and willing to try anything in bed.
This movie was shot in Switzerland and you get great sceanic vies of the alps. A lot of scenes of Zurich are included better than the usual fare.
Pretty European woman having sex. I must say they look a lot more natural than thier American counterparts.
It had a different look than most films. The women look like they actualy enjoy sex.
Olinka was billed as the star of this movie yet she was only in one scene. She is also billed as a Marylin Monroe look alike, She is pretty but looks nothing like MM.
Great sceanery pretty women short on plot I give it a 7.