Andrew's Rating:

Starring: Christy Canyon, Jamie Summers, Danielle Rogers, Mickey Ray, TT Boy and a couple of others.
The performances in this vid were pretty good. This flick is somewhat unusual in that the actual "acting" is often better than the sexual performances. Regardless of the movie's overall heat, the cast is attractive. . . Christy and Jamie (who are the main focus of this vid) are both easy to look at.
What did you think of the film's production values?
This is a very well made Paul Thomas film. The lighting, camera work and editing are well done.
Like a lot of PT's work, this movie focusses too much on the plot as opposed to the sex. I have nothing against porn with a plot, but my main reason for watching is the sex! Afterall, it's easy to see "plot" just by flicking on the tv.

I'd rate this movie as lukewarm. There was definitely the potential for this flick to rate much higher on the erotic scale, it's just that there's simply not enough sex!

Christy and Jamie both look great. When they're in action, they're pretty hot. Unfortunately, the sex scenes in this vid are just too short to fully capitalize on the cast.

Obviously, I didn't enjoy the lack of "heat" in the sex scenes. As someone who watches porn with his fiancee, I can attest that porn for couples should be "hot". . . not the tepid fare that is usually served up by the vid makers.
Also, this movie is really short. At around 70 minutes (not counting the credits/scenes from part 1), there's just way too much plot and too little sex. . . this is a porn movie afterall!

Overall, this is pretty average (ie. boring) couples porn, I'll give it a It's not terrible by any stetch of the imagination, it's just that Paul Thomas has done much better than this.

Posted By Andrew, www.excaliburfilms.com | 10/12/06 1:58 PM