The Philogynist's Rating:

Starring: Kelly Havel, a glamorous doll whose eyes just lure you in, like a tractor beam locked on to your soul. (In other words, she's real pretty. ) Dahlia Grey, who could make your heart beat faster even dressed as Colonel Sanders. (she's real pretty, too. ) Isabella Camille and Pamela Petrokova also star. The movie looks like a string of glossy solo scenes strewn together only most have a lesbian set-lup. The sex is basically kissing, rubbing and caressing. Again, director Andrew Blake presents style over substance.

Lighting and camera angles are superb. Directing is great technically, questionable artistically. The lingerie, make-up and hair are all exquisite. The music was not distracting as it sounded like a cross between alternative rock and a mariachi band. There's not a single word of dialogue. If there's a story, it's told through images alone.

Frustrating. It's like peering into the candy store knowing you can not sample a single item. (Could be the underlining feelinf for all porn, but here its' truly self-evident). Dahlia's legs are as sexy as she thinks they are and I love seeing them enjoyed by feminine fingers and tongues. There are some pretty formed vaginas as pink is such a beautiful color on a woman, be it in wardrobe or flesh. Kelly spends a good portion of the time allowing Isabella to molest her in the bathroom. She even has her arm pit shaved then licked. (I would gladly lick every inch of Ms. Havel, but I'd let her shave her own pits. ) There is a good deal of light bondage and submission and plenty of self-groping.

Dahli and Kelly. Any section of this movie for about twenty minutes can be quite erotic. Beyond that, no dice.

It's repetition, Also, I would like the women in porn, if not 'making love' per say, to at least fuck each others' brains out! It need not be every scene, but it can not be completely absent, either.

My opinion is that the title probably refers to Andrew Blake's case file, if on the off-chance you ever want to break into his psychiatrist's office. On sheer eye candy alone, I bestow upon this film the generous rating of 6.

Posted By The Philogynist, www.excaliburfilms.com | 10/12/06 1:58 PM

Rick Windsor's Rating:

Starring: DHALIA GREY.

The film has costed a lot of money because it was shot in Rome.

This movie is not as erotic as it is meant to be. Mainly because of the absence of a male character and due to the fixation of the director on the main character.

What I hated most about the movie is the fact that it is called High Heels, but it does not reveal any of the erotic fetishes of high heels or legs or barefeet.

What I did not enjoy in this film was the indian music played through out the film and which was not in any way relevant to the aimed but unachieved eroticism.

High Heels is not erotic, not sensual, it's not soft porn,and it's definately not hardporn. The actresses performing are superbly beautiful and sexy but without a plot or at least a simple conversation in the movie, the audience will still see the characters as vague, no matter how hard they tried not to. In my personal humble opinion this movie deserves 2 over 10.

Posted By Rick Windsor, www.excaliburfilms.com | 10/12/06 1:58 PM